In 2002, the U.S. Congress developed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) to address concerns regarding public education. Over the years, problems with the NCLB emerged. One of the most common issues was its heavy reliance on test scores to measure success. 

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) is the law that replaced the NCLB in 2015. Its purpose is to provide high-quality education to all students.

The ESSA shifted decision-making from a federal to a state level. While it still requires standardized testing, that is only one factor in measuring success. The ESSA also provides more funding. This gives teachers, students, and families more resources to overcome barriers.

This article discusses the purpose, highlights, and standards of the ESSA. 

Purpose

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) is a law that replaced the NCLB in 2015. Its purpose is to provide high-quality education to all children in the U.S., better prepare students for life after high school, and address barriers for disadvantaged children.

Differences Between ESSA and NCLB

Differences between the ESSA and NCLB include:

ESSA Highlights

ESSA shifts decision-making to a state rather than federal level. It provides states the opportunity to recognize and help low-performing schools.

ESSA also provides more involvement in improvement efforts for parents and the community.  

States set high academic challenges. However, they have more flexibility in testing and measuring success. The following are a few highlights from ESSA.

High Expectations and Increased Student Achievement

States are required to set challenging academic standards and be specific about how they will measure those standards. States and school districts must provide state report cards to parents online.

Recognition of Gaps in Achievement

Each state is responsible for identifying and providing solutions for poor-performing schools, students, and subgroups of students.

What this means for students: Students have clear expectations and know how they and their school are progressing.

Examples of these subgroups of students include:

  • MinoritiesChildren with disabilitiesChildren who live in povertyEnglish-language learners Children who are homelessChildren who live in foster careChildren of parents who are in the military

More Flexibility at a Local Level

ESSA provides flexibility in decision-making at a local level, including how and when to give standardized tests. While ESSA still requires standardized testing, schools, teachers, and students are not evaluated on tests alone.

What this means for students: The ESSA encourages faster recognition of disadvantaged students and provides them with more resources.

Evaluation includes four academic factors and at least one school quality measurement. This encourages a focus on a well-rounded education that involves social and emotional learning.

Increased Funding 

Increased funding provides resources that help high-risk students meet academic standards. This includes activities, programs, or courses to create a well-rounded education.

What this means for students: Schools can measure a portion of student success by creativity and progress rather than test scores.

A few examples of where schools can use funds can include:

  • School psychological services
  • School safety
  • Parental engagement
  • Music or art courses
  • After-school or summer programs
  • Physical education

Standards

ESSA ensures that states set high academic standards for all schools and students. Schools assess performance in reading, math, and science. The standards also apply to teacher training, curriculum, and instructor materials.

What this means for students: Programs such as prekindergarten help provide an educational foundation for all students, regardless of financial barriers. Psychological services can help with student resilience, performance, and coping mechanisms. Studying music teaches children teamwork, creativity, concentration, and social skills. These skills will help them stand out when entering the workforce or college after graduation.

Academic Standards

States and schools set challenging standards that apply to all students. Academic standards define what each student should learn for each grade.

Annual Testing

Like the NCLB, the ESSA requires yearly standardized testing for reading and math for children in third to eighth grade. It also involves testing in science at least three times before graduation.

Common Core

States can still use common core standards if that works best for them. However, the federal government does not encourage states to use this measurement.

The ESSA allows for flexibility regarding the types and timing of the tests. Schools can decide to test once a year or several times throughout the year. 

School Accountability

The state submits its plan for standards and evaluation to the federal government for approval. Once approved, states measure how schools are doing and hold them accountable for student learning and achievement.

While tests scores may still be a factor, ESSA encourages states to measure success in additional ways. States choose at least four academic factors and one school factor for evaluation.

Reading and Literacy Programs

ESSA emphasizes providing resources to students, subgroups, or schools that are falling behind. This includes creating programs such as the National Center on Improving Literacy. It focuses on reading, comprehension, and literacy skills for children with disabilities, including dyslexia.

Academic and School Quality Factors

Examples of factors include:

ESSA provides funding to help schools increase literacy by providing up to $192 million in grant funds to states and schools that struggle in this area.

Summary 

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) is the education policy or law that replaced the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) in 2015. The ESSA’s purpose is to provide high-quality education to all students. It shifts decision-making from a federal to a state level, giving states more flexibility. 

While states set high academic standards for all students, they have more say about measuring and testing. One of the act’s goals is faster recognition and use of resources for students, subgroups, or schools who are falling behind.

A Word From Verywell 

If you are a parent or caregiver, you may have questions about what ESSA means for you, your family, and the community. One of the most positive aspects of ESSA is that it requires states to get input from parents and families as they create state plans and work on improvement. If you want to be more involved, reach out to your school district or state education department to learn more. 

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Is the ESSA still in effect?
  • Yes, as of 2022, ESSA is still in effect. However, the U.S. Department of Education allowed adjustments to accountability measures during the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years. This was due to circumstances created by COVID-19.
  • Is the ESSA an improvement over NCLB?
  • Yes, if applied correctly, it is an improvement over NCLB. The ESSA gives states more flexibility, decreases the emphasis on standardized test scores, and provides more program funding. However, it is relatively new, and congress plans to re-evaluate it to ensure it works the way it intended.
  • How does the ESSA affect teachers?
  • Schools will no longer evaluate teachers based on test scores alone. Ideally, teachers will also have more input regarding curriculums, standards, tests, and solutions for underperformance. Increased funding involves more teacher training and development.

Yes, as of 2022, ESSA is still in effect. However, the U.S. Department of Education allowed adjustments to accountability measures during the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years. This was due to circumstances created by COVID-19.

Yes, if applied correctly, it is an improvement over NCLB. The ESSA gives states more flexibility, decreases the emphasis on standardized test scores, and provides more program funding. However, it is relatively new, and congress plans to re-evaluate it to ensure it works the way it intended. 

Schools will no longer evaluate teachers based on test scores alone. Ideally, teachers will also have more input regarding curriculums, standards, tests, and solutions for underperformance. Increased funding involves more teacher training and development.